market economy based on enterprise system by restructuring the current encounter all types of enterprises is a very important question is how to divide the enterprise system, my view is that the owner should be based on the different forms of corporate assets to divide the business. Therefore, to get rid of by enterprises under the planned economy of the four standard 1, to get rid of enterprises by ownership divided by the standard. Public enterprises into the enterprise and private ownership enterprises, enterprises marked \Inside ownership is divided into state ownership, collective ownership, in our traditional concepts of collective ownership is higher than public ownership, collective ownership to the ownership by the whole transition. In fact, the whole people and collective now difficult to distinguish, and some would say is a small national group, the National is a large group, which in itself leads to confusion in the enterprise. So I think the Chinese industrial and commercial registration of enterprise ownership in this column should be removed as soon as possible to cancel, which is the development of enterprises is a liberation. 2, to get rid of all roads to divide the company according to administrative criteria. I think learning Chinese in 1950 left the Soviet planned economy is today the aftermath of one of the largest companies by roads dictatorship. All roads lead to our government buildings, artificially intrinsically linked to some productivity separated. For example, 20 years in the reform of our government, in the adjustment function in the transition,天津企业名录, while the Ministry of Machinery Electronics Division points together for a while. Owned enterprises while the administration of the Ministry of Machinery Industry, now owned by administration of the Ministry of Electronics Industry, in fact, in terms of machinery and electronics technology, production, circulation, it is intrinsically linked, it is difficult to divide according to administrative roads. But our roads marked by the stigma of business, every business has an administrative department. Of course, after 20 years of development has greatly improved the situation, but the basic still not resolved. 3, to get rid of the administrative departments and regions to divide the company's standards. Such as in Shandong, Hebei enterprises on both sides of the junction of internal relations, the company can supply the parts to assemble another enterprise, but belonging to Shandong and Hebei tube, then the company must pass Shijiazhuang, Jinan, another company must approve and then pass contact can occur, called \Why is so much local protectionism? Key enterprises under the local control. We joined the WTO, the so-called economic globalization is the global market or globalization of markets, the market economy should be a unified national market. Enterprises should be able to trans-regional, inter-departmental, cross-business activities. 4, to get rid of division according to administrative level to enterprise standards. While it is the central document also proposed the future business leaders not to divide by grade, but the actual practice of some policies, such as the mobilization of cadres, are still at the administrative level. If you do not break the set, the enterprise is difficult to adapt to market requirements. Practice has proved that the confusion is that now business division of scientific enterprise system, we must in accordance with the market economy by the standards of business, that is a different form by the owner of corporate assets to divide. Enterprise system in the 21st century by the three forms of ownership of enterprise assets to divide, there are basically three kind of enterprise: a class of companies, two types of individual enterprises and three types of partnerships, it is enterprise system in the 21st Century 3 basic forms. Difference between these three kinds of business owners is that different forms of corporate assets and personal assets owned by individuals owned enterprises, which generated benefits under his, the risk arising from his all to take, how to manage the course, he said the operator; second partnership is funded by a number of partners to, so partnership is a partner of property owner; The third company. Is composed of two or more corporate enterprises raise funds, so the company is the asset owners in the form of two or more, and is fund raising, fund-raising component of the corporate enterprises, which is a basic form of corporate business; Companies Limited liability system; company implemented the separation of owners and operators of the system, the owner is a shareholder, on behalf of the operator to manager; company must establish a corporate governance structure. Specification is our next important task of enterprise restructuring. Establishing a modern enterprise system is the direction of the reform of state-owned enterprises, specifically that the corporate restructuring of state-owned enterprises. The corporate restructuring of state-owned enterprises to solve so I felt a few questions: 1, the state-owned corporate system must be changed two or more corporate enterprises funded. We are a large number of state-owned enterprises into state-owned companies, which were very irregular, it is only a replica of state-owned enterprises. 2, the number of state-owned enterprises put together into a so-called limited liability company, this is not standard. We carried out the mid-eighties the so-called cross-shareholdings between the practice of state-owned enterprises, and use it as a joint-stock enterprises, so the concept of joint-stock companies is very confusing, very standard. 3, the dozens of state-owned enterprises, collective enterprises put together as a group, this group of companies which are all state-owned enterprises and collective enterprises, in fact, are state-owned assets, such groups is not standardized, the next step is also facing restructuring. State-owned enterprises into companies, have the following situations: A whole to the company. My view is that the state-owned enterprises are profitable to the company first, but there are effective state-owned enterprises into companies, government says you should profit to the government; enterprise workers wages that I can change the bonus Why? If so it again when there is no benefit to change the company, no one is willing to invest capital, because at least into the company's shareholders to absorb a new coming. So when there is effective to change, this is the first step. Second, the whole company can not change, I felt I could cut restructuring, but restructuring the current cut the biggest problem encountered is that when it changed the company, such as to listed companies, the company and his mother are all very chaotic complex. I think that after restructuring, we must regulate the relationship between the parent company and subsidiaries. Third, if the overall change not a company, not a block has changed, I think we can sell to sole proprietorship or partnership. Fourth, if the above three kinds of practices are not feasible, I think we can be changed to stock cooperative enterprises, as a transitional form of it, because the stock cooperative system is now faced with new problems. I have been to a stock cooperative enterprises, it turned out to be state-owned enterprises into shareholding cooperative system 5 years ago. Stock cooperative system of state-owned enterprises than progressive, but a long time, also produced two contradictions, one is full on average shares, resulting in a new egalitarian; some workers said, and he shares as much as I dry The average dividend over, why driving through? Now our state-owned enterprises, collective enterprises more prominent within the egalitarian ideology, market economy, we must recognize the differences and recognize the principle of giving priority to efficiency, so the stock cooperative enterprises of the full ownership by the average challenges; second problem is one of two identities, this person is both a shareholder and employee, so it is the shareholders decide on the most important issues of trade unions. This case tells me the two most important employee shareholders will have the defect, a defect that will be elected by the shareholders of the enterprise trade union director, manager, capable but can not choose the nice guy up because he is absolutely workers to vote look at the people how he. In general, in the enterprise to officers, officers must adhere to the principle of adhering to principles tend to offend people, offending people to the crucial moment he will not cast your vote, so I think the director of an enterprise, the manager can only be appointed , and not engage in trade union democracy and elections can not be appointed by the government administration. Several hundred years of foreign business executives, director appointment is in line with market economy laws. Another flaw, the employees shareholders to vote on major issues, one open staff meeting of shareholders, they are more concerned about the immediate benefits, when it comes to the vital interests of each person to fierce arguments, and long-term development of the company no one to consider. They told me that stock cooperative system is likely to eat for the immediate and splitting the enterprise, the lack of long-term development after the effort, so the stock cooperative enterprises are also facing the second restructuring, to change the corporate system. SOE Reform could take different forms, but changed to today, I think there are two problems: First, how to exit the state capital, and second, how the workers as replacement, no matter into which these two issues types of enterprise system, must be addressed. Market economy system by the company based on (a) of the company system by How the system of division of the company? My opinion, in accordance with \It will not have other forms of companies such as the two combined company, partnership, etc.? It is for life. I think now we should take these three kinds of company system as the basis for standardizing the system, their difference lies in the difference of external debt obligations bear, that is a limited liability company limited liability,企业名录, joint stock company shares to social responsibility by listed companies according to the capital market, the stock market to take responsibility. (B) of the enterprise system, the basic content of From 3 to form part of, one, enterprise property right system; Second, organizational systems; third is enterprise management system. I think that summed up all the business issues that these three issues, which the three parts of a whole, are indispensable. The current management system is established Chinese enterprises should pay attention to several issues: 1,山东企业名录, linked to and the property rights system. Generally speaking that is not business management,上海企业名录, but by what you are property rights system. Such as sole proprietorship, I think he can engage in family management, and now some people criticized it, I went to Wenzhou, it was said, who said a bad family management? He used his wife to govern the financial and son tube marketing, daughter engaged in procurement, This is his personal assets, he says goes, as to manage the internal affairs of his bad, of course, that if he has a legal to the illegal sanctions, but that management was his thing; partnership management system is a partner discuss how to handle Some high-tech enterprises in Zhongguancun is a partnership, the partners discuss how to handle regardless of the owners and operators. So how the enterprise management system, which must be closely related to his system of property rights, property rights is a prerequisite, and left the property in terms of management, management is abstract. China is a major problem is to leave the property rights system to talk about business management. 2, the organizational system is the guarantee. To improve management, organizational regime. System of organization, there are many similarities, sole proprietorship organization, individual words; partnership organization partners have the final say; most complex of the company, the company's organizational issues, I think it should solve two problems: First, the company organizational structure should be reasonable. Organizational structure of the company to be reasonable is the most important thing is corporate, not a legal unit within the company, can not engage in secondary legal, simulated body, commission legal persons. Of course, if a group of companies, then the relationship between parent and subsidiary, is the relationship between legal entities and legal persons, but can not name one, two, three, because there is no corporate level. The second is to establish a standard company organization, which is the corporate governance structure. I talked about earlier, an important feature of the company is to establish corporate governance structure, so companies have shareholders, board of directors elected by the general meeting of shareholders, board of directors to appoint general manager, but you can not get this show on individual proprietorship enterprises. 3, handle the relationship between systems and people. I think that a company's shareholders, directors, managers can be constantly changing, the system has to be continuity. Our problem now is to leave the system in the abstract in terms of people-oriented, people-centered, so should people-oriented, people-centered business management really put in place need to emphasize the following: to improve people's quality is to improve the management of the key; to emphasis on corporate team building, corporate culture to emphasize cohesion. Recently Liu (continued on page 23) (Continued from page 22) There is a saying about the better, he said, prefer first-class team, second-rate technology,宁波企业名录, and not second-rate team, first-class technology. Three Chinese enterprises in the 21st century form of business is to play a key form of small businesses, large enterprises and large enterprises the respective roles of the deformation of the body, and effectively coordinate their marketing interests Category I Category 3 form of the enterprise: namely, small businesses, large enterprises and large enterprises deformed. For small businesses, I suggest that the state has adopted laws to determine the small business standards. Large enterprises should be represented by large companies, particularly listed companies and the corporation. Deformed, there are two large companies, one is the Enterprise Group, the core of the so-called Group is the parent company, including subsidiaries, including the economic union, which itself is not a business; called alliances. I think it is for the enterprise group will be to the standards to regulate transnational corporations. Alliances among transnational corporations to be, called alliances, called combination, so I think the slogan of combination can not be free to use within the group can not engage in business combination, and only one parent can not have strong more, so companies have no kernel. Large enterprises and the role of small businesses are complementary, not substitutes for one another, competing. This view the 21st century we will certainly be strengthened. Some people ask, in the end is a good small business or large company is better? I think that big companies should gradually evolved from small businesses should be small to big, from weak to strong. Without the development of enterprises in China 30-50 years, in order to truly create a competitive multinational companies is very difficult. So I think we do business, to feel calm, not too impetuous, and impetuous business can only lead to too much short-lived, short-lived business too much. Generation of an enterprise is not able to complete, and it needs efforts of several generations. Deformed large enterprises, enterprise groups, and business alliances have their role. They can cooperate in the competition, and cooperation in the competition, this form of 3 companies each have their own role, the only way forward to coordinate the development of our business. Chinese companies on how to develop the 21st century, I think the fundamental issue is how to solve the system of innovation, institutional norms, all policies should be conducive to business development of healthy norms; and engage in business must have a long-term vision can not engage in short-term behavior.